Twelve-Step “Pride Elimination” Plan

At the end of Lent, as we are called to put the Crucified One at the center of our lives, we are also encouraged to let go of the many subtle ways pride tempts us to keep ourselves at the heart of things.

Narcissus versus Christ washing the feet of Peter

Pride is the deadliest of the deadly sins. It is unrealistic, unattractive, and unprofitable. One would have to be rather foolish, it seems, to grant significant room in his life for pride. If the devil could laugh, and the angels could weep, they would do so over the way we human beings stubbornly cling to ourselves as the center and the meaning of reality. That is pride. Yet, of all the seven deadly sins, it is the most subtle to diagnose, the most common, and the most difficult to eliminate. We should note, however, that not all pride is deadly (cf. 1 Jn 5:17). There is a sense in which pride is fully justified. A parent has this kind of “good” pride when his children attain some standard of excellence. Likewise, a coach can be proud of his players for comporting themselves with good sportsmanship. Good pride conforms to a good standard; bad pride does not. St. Thomas Aquinas referred to this latter kind of pride as the attempt to achieve a “perverse excellence.” Though it has many facets, this form of pride is, basically, an inordinate desire for praise, honors, and recognition. Because it is “inordinate,” it is out of synchrony with whom we really are, as well as our proper place in the grand scheme of things. “In general,” as John Ruskin has remarked, “pride is at the bottom of all great mistakes.”

At the end of Lent, as we are called to put the Crucified One at the center of our lives, we are also encouraged to let go of the many subtle ways pride tempts us to keep ourselves at the heart of things. Here are some points for our own examination of conscience as we stand before the pierced heart of Jesus.

Pride as Unrealistic:
1) Pride is unrealistic on a personal level. We are not the cause of our own being. We do not bestow upon ourselves whatever gifts we have. Our life is short, and our hour fleeting. It is, as Shakespeare called it, a “brief candle.” It is a mere moment in time, a veritable sliver wedged between two eternities. It makes far more sense that humble gratitude be our dominant characteristic rather than pride. One thing we can truly take credit for is our willingness to attain such humble gratitude.

2) Pride is unrealistic on an historical level. Piety is one virtue that has lost a great deal of its force and beauty in the present era. It honors the historical factors that give us, not only our life, but all the opportunities, conveniences, blessings, and riches to which we are heir. Thus, we honor our parents and our ancestry, as well as our tradition. Because we receive more than we can possibly give, an attitude of thanksgiving seems to be far appropriate than the desire to seek praise.

3) Pride is unrealistic on a social level. Each person is but one among nearly seven billion souls who presently populate the world. Cooperation with others is the key to a well-ordered, peaceful, and prosperous society. A multitude of prideful egos breeds calamity. The proud person is reluctant to yield to the views of others principally because he wants his own way to prevail. Pride unchecked is a recipe for social catastrophe. One ego getting its own way is possible; two competing egos getting their own way is not possible.

4) Pride is unrealistic on a theological level. We are creatures. Therefore, it is owing to the beneficence of our Creator that we came into existence. The fundamental distinction between Creator and creature is one that Adam and Eve, in their pride, failed to honor. Their Original Sin of pride, which caused their dismissal from Paradise, and has plagued their descendants ever since, is the consequence of this failure. The creature should not aspire to be more than he can become. This is the sin of presumption. The Creator is not proud for being the Creator. That is within his province. His creatures should honor both the reality of their Creator, as well as their own reality.

Pride as Unattractive:
5) Boastfulness is unattractive. “The proud hate pride—in others,” Benjamin Franklin quipped in his Poor Richard’s Almanac. The boastful person (the braggart, the show-off) is essentially boring. No one enjoys the spectacle of another person trying to create the impression that he is larger, or more important, than others know him to be. Boastfulness is a verbal manifestation of pride. Its essential weakness lies in the fact that actions speak louder than words, as people are far more impressed by good actions.

6) Ostentation is unattractive. A person, by flaunting his elaborate attire, affected manners, or costly possessions, may try to convince others of his superiority. This strategy backfires when it provokes laughter or derision. Ostentation is fine for a peacock. Modesty is more appropriate for human beings. Ostentation sends the unwelcomed message: “Look at me!” Unfortunately, people see more deeply than what is on the surface. The ostentatious person can make a very sad spectacle of himself.

7) Hypocrisy is unattractive. Hypocrisy is the attempt to make people think that you are better than you know yourself to be. It is a fairly universal vice, and a left-handed way in which vice pays tribute to virtue. But it is shallow and dishonest. Therefore, it is essentially unattractive, as any other form of duplicity is unattractive. People prefer to witness the shining example of moral integrity. But that is something which they observe, not something that they are tricked into believing.

8) Self-absorption is unattractive. “Man is a social animal,” as Aristotle rightly pointed out. We read in Genesis, “It is not good for man to be alone.” Self-absorption is more than unrealistic. It conveys a certain contempt for all others. C. S. Lewis has noted that “A proud man is always looking down on things and people; and, of course, as long as you’re looking down, you can’t see something that’s above you.” The glaring fact that the self-absorbed person misses out on a great deal, makes him out to be someone to be pitied, not praised.

Pride is Unprofitable:
9) Pride is unprofitable because it is precipitous, which is to say that it brings about a fall. This time-honored and Biblically-rooted axiom can be easily illustrated. Hold a small object, such as a baseball, at arm’s length and, then, release it. To no one’s astonishment, it falls to the floor. The reason it falls is because nothing is supporting it. Because pride does not have a foundation in reality, it can do nothing other than fall. Hence, it is not only unprofitable, but actually counterproductive. “I charge thee, fling away ambition,” warned Shakespeare, “By that sin fell the angels” (Henry VIII, III: 2).

10) Pride is unprofitable because it is wasteful. Pride is a wasteful expenditure of time and energy. Working, humbly, in God’s vineyard, is far more productive (though it might not get headlines) than trying to convince others of an illusion. Catholic convert, Malcolm Muggeridge, titled his autobiography, Chronicles of Wasted Time, because he came to realize that a great deal of his life was misspent because it flowed from that pernicious species of pride known as selfish ambition.

11) Pride is unprofitable because it is self-rejecting. Pride is a mask that is used to conceal our real self that we have rejected. It is a form of despair, as the philosopher, Søren Kierkegaard, has described at length, because it installs an artificial self in the place of the real self. People speak of “swallowing one’s pride.” It is surely advisable to swallow one’s pride in order to allow one’s real self to emerge. We might add that no one has ever choked to death as a result of swallowing his pride.

12) Pride is unprofitable because it is cataclysmic insofar as it sets a spark to the other six deadly sins. Because pride is unrealistic (more specifically, vain and presumptuous), the proud person will meet with opposition and, as a result, experience much frustration. This frustration inevitably leads to anger and envy toward others who have fared better. Such a person, in addition, may give up and seek the solace of sloth. Or he may try to ease the torment of his frustrations in lustful, gluttonous, or avaricious ways. Pride can set in motion a cascade of sins.

The mythical Narcissus is the personification of deadly pride. His incessant praise of himself led him to neglect the necessities of life and, therefore, to his premature demise. The Narcissus myth is a cautionary tale warning people against the vanity of pride. Christ, on the other hand, tells us that he is “meek and humble of heart.” Moreover, Scripture tells us that he was obedient unto death.

The choice between Narcissus and Christ is, intellectually, not difficult to make. But on the practical level of our own lived lives, it requires all that we can muster. Christ goes to the cross to replace our own sniveling pride and insecurities with his own power and infinity.

Donald DeMarco, Ph.D. About Donald DeMarco, Ph.D.

Donald DeMarco, Ph.D., is a senior fellow of HLI America, an Initiative of Human Life International. He is professor emeritus at St. Jerome's University in Waterloo, Ontario, and an adjunct professor at Holy Apostles College & Seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut. Some of his recent writings may be found at HLI America's Truth and Charity Forum.

Comments

  1. Avatar Christine A Cassella says:

    I felt the need to print this 12 Step Pride Elimination Plan out because, as I read it, I could see myself in some of it and need to do this “elimination”. Thank you for explaining it so well that I could see me in it. So many that are very intellectual use very, what I call “high class words”, that make you lose interest because you don’t understand what the real meaning is. I find that this is a reading I must recall often to help eliminate the ever-deadly “PRIDE”.

  2. Avatar Mike Kline says:

    Father James Schall, in his book, Schall on Chesterton: Timely Essays on Timeless Paradoxes, includes his thoughts on Chesterton’s essay – “Against Pride.” Father Schall points out that Chesterton’s definition of pride is as good a definition as any. Pride is when we make ourselves to ‘constitute the supreme standard of things.’ Schall goes on to state, in following Chesterton: ‘Pride consists in a man making his personality the only test, instead of making the truth the test.’

    Father Schall ends his essay with the following: “We can look on our times perhaps as ordinary, in which there are demonstrable and frequent incidents of all the vices. Yet, there is a nagging worry that it is a time in which everything is molded around one vice. This is the vice that corrupts all the virtues and all the vices. It is the vice that justifies abortion on a theory of choice and divorce on a theory of freedom. It is the vice that maintains that no one is guilty. It is the vice that abolishes any distinction of good and evil. It is the vice that says that all is relative, that nothing is true. Its model remains ‘I shall not serve.’ Chesterton’s one sermon against pride remains the one that we most need to hear in our days. This may be the reason why we are least likely to hear it. And this too is pride.”

  3. Avatar Martin Drew says:

    Yes I agree The pride of life is quite dangerous in being opposite of the practice of Prudence, Justice, Temporance and Fortitude which are within the form of the virtues: Charity or love of God and others. The publican came to the temple to pray and said Lord be merciful to me a sinner while the other person a pharisee Acknowledged himself in his own mind and actions

Trackbacks

  1. […] Twelve-Step “Pride Elimination” Plan – Donald DeMarco PhD, H&PR Latin American Sacred Music: An Overview – M. Lawrence, Chant Café Praying to Dead Folks – Tim Staples, Catholic Answers Melchizedek and the Priesthood – Mark Shea, National Catholic Register Same-Sex Marriage & the Abyss of Nihilism – Carson Holloway, PD Preparing for the Next Conclave – Dr. Edward Peters, Canon Law Blog Humility & Matthew Crawley – Patrick Archbold, Creative Minority Report Stations @ St. Chrysogonus Basilica, Mon. in Passion Week – Zephyrinus Kevin to Devin: Catholic to Protestant – Kevin O’Brien, Waiting. . . The Power of Catholic Fridays – Tom Hoopes, National Catholic Register Piers, Penn, and the Essence of Catholicism – Brian Jones, The CWR Blog The Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage – William M. Briggs Lies, Damned Lies, and U. N. Meetings – Austin Ruse, Crisis Magazine Portman: Right on the Court, Wrong on Marriage – Ryan T. Anderson […]